maionewyork.blogg.se

T-mobile freehold township
T-mobile freehold township












t-mobile freehold township

Later that year, representatives of T-Mobile appeared before the Planning Board to appeal the zoning officer’s order. In denying the application, the zoning officer said the Superior Court ruled in favor of T-Mobile because of a gap in its coverage area, which was based on evidence that was produced before the zoning board during the hearings in 20.Īmong other reasons, the zoning officer’s denial in 2018 was based on coverage differences between 20 and nearly a decade having elapsed since T-Mobile provided evidence of a coverage gap. Township officials said the stop work order was issued because the construction permit T-Mobile possessed had expired and the company no longer had a valid construction permit.Īn application from T-Mobile to install the cell tower was subsequently denied by the township zoning officer in 2018. In late 2017, municipal officials issued a stop work order against the cell tower’s construction after equipment and materials to drill foundations were reported to have been mobilized at 169 Robertsville Road. In 2011, T-Mobile received permission from the Superior Court to build the cell tower. The Freehold Township Zoning Board of Adjustment, which has since been combined with the Planning Board, denied the company’s application in 2009. For years, residents of the neighborhood have voiced their opposition to any plan that calls for the construction of a cell tower at the property. The property at 169 Robertsville Road in a semi-rural area of Freehold Township was targeted for a cell tower by T-Mobile in 2007.














T-mobile freehold township